The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. On October 2, 2013, the Defendant appeared as a witness in the Daejeon High Court located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon High Court on October 2, 2013, and in the case of claiming construction cost (No. 2013Na 100466), the Plaintiff Company filed against Defendant E., the Defendant appeared as a witness.

Defendant testified as follows.

(1) The witness, at the construction site on April 3, 2012, states that “F-ro and G secretary would pay the Plaintiff the instant construction cost directly to the Plaintiff.”

I am directly talked about that he had talked

In the examination of the Plaintiff’s agent, “I will do so......”

“The testimony was made.”

(2) The witness directly testified that F and G directly give a definite answer to the construction work of the instant construction site (three floors) at the instant construction site to H and I.

In the examination of the Defendant’s agent, “I have to pay in full as a separate example, as a whole,” and

This kind of money now has been accused of the Ministry of Labor with a lot of money that has not been directly paid, but it has not yet been suffering by many people.

“The testimony was made.”

(3) At the time of the commencement of the construction work, the construction work was scheduled to proceed as a draft designed by the Defendant’s side. At the time of the commencement of the construction work, the Defendant’s design design was not finally determined and the construction scope and quantity was too dynamic, and the construction period was too imminent. Accordingly, the construction is commenced first, but the construction contract was concluded later by the Plaintiff’s agent, “It is essential that the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to prepare the construction contract later.”

“The testimony was made.”

(4) Around April 10, 2012, at the time of the commencement of the construction work and the five days after the commencement of the construction work, the Plaintiff Company’s H demanded the Defendant Company’s G secretary to prepare a contract with the witness at the Defendant’s office, and as the Plaintiff Company H demanded the Defendant Company G secretary to prepare the contract, whether G is bad, and whether the Plaintiff is unable to receive the construction cost due to the nephical horse.

May Ma, which is now the price.