logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.06.21 2016고단2621
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 26, 2010, the Defendant, “2016 Highest 2621, the Defendant,” from the clothes stores operated by the Defendant in Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-si, to the victim E, “The amount of KRW 500 million with land compensation, KRW 4 billion with the head of the Tong in the Tong, and the amount of KRW 4 billion with money at present, would be repaid until December 2010, where money is loaned to him/her.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the defendant did not have 4 billion won, and even if he borrowed money from the injured party due to no relation with the defendant, there was no intention or ability to pay the money.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, obtained a total of 50 million won, including six million won in cash from the victim, and KRW 1.1 million from the date of September 14, 2010, and KRW 1.1 million from October 1, 2010, and KRW 4.1 million from October 1, 2010, and KRW 508 million from the account of the Defendant’s City Bank.

"2016 Highest 2994"

1. On February 201, 201, the Defendant: (a) in the above G while the victim C, who was in F in Suwon C, was admitted to G, a warden, the Defendant: (b) “Around February 201, the Victim C, who was admitted to said G, has six months of lending money to the Defendant.”

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the injured party due to the absence of any particular property, he/she did not have any intention or ability to change it more than six months.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 6.5 million won from the injured party and acquired it by fraud.

2. On April 29, 2011, the Defendant would allow the victim to purchase the studio around Ydong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, even if the defendant receives money from the victim, there was no idea to invest in real estate, and there was no intention or ability to purchase the studio to the victim after six months.

arrow