The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment, and additional collection) is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are extenuating circumstances such as the confession of the Defendant to commit the instant crime, the Defendant committed a misunderstanding in depth, and actively cooperated with the investigation of other narcotics-related criminal, the Defendant has been sentenced eight times to imprisonment for the same criminal act on June 30, 201, and on February 3, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months for the same criminal act on June 30, 201, and was released from a repeated crime on February 3, 2012 without being aware of the fact that the execution of the instant punishment was completed, and the Defendant committed a crime No. 1 in the holding that the instant crime was administered on March 30, 2012, and committed a crime No. 2 in the judgment mediating the trade of the E-W phone on February 7, 2013.

In addition, in full view of the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, circumstances after the crime of this case, and all the sentencing conditions as shown in the arguments and records of this case, it cannot be deemed that the sentence imposed by the court below is too inappropriate. Thus, the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.