The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below (one hundred months of imprisonment, confiscation, and collection) is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are extenuating circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant made confessions of all the crimes of this case and misunderstandings, again, he voluntarily submitted philophones in custody while making efforts not to commit such crimes, and that the defendant contributed to the arrest of a drug offender by actively cooperating in the investigation into narcotics, the defendant committed the crimes of this case at the same time even prior to the fact that he committed the crimes of this case even though he had been sentenced several times of punishment due to the same crime, the defendant sold and sold, delivered, and possessed, and the quantity of philophones is significant, and all other sentencing conditions as shown in the arguments and records of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, circumstances of the crime of this case, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the above argument of the defendant is not unreasonable since the defendant's punishment imposed by the court below is not too unreasonable.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.