logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원평택지원 2016.04.28 2015가단7010
대여금 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff’s assertion of KRW 30,00,000 on the loan certificate dated May 26, 1999, and KRW 49,20,000,000 on the authentic deed of a monetary loan agreement dated January 21, 200, and KRW 14,400,000 on each letter of January 21, 200, plus KRW 93,60,000 on each letter of January 21, 200, minus KRW 32,400,000 paid from the beginning of 2010 to the end of 2013.

2. Determination

A. According to the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 3, it is recognized that the defendant written and sent to the plaintiff the certificate of 30,000,000 won borrowed on May 26, 199, the certificate of 49,200,000 won cash loan contract dated January 21, 200, and the letter of 14,400,000 won paid to the plaintiff on January 21, 200.

In regard to this, the defendant alleged that the above loan certificate, the notarial deed of a monetary loan loan contract, and each letter is invalid by a false conspiracy, but it is not sufficient to recognize only the statements in subparagraphs 1 through 5, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

B. The defendant asserts that his claim on the above loan certificate, the notarial deed on the money loan loan contract, and the notarial deed on the notarial deed has already been extinguished by the prescription. Considering the overall purport of the pleadings in the statement in subparagraphs 1 through 3 and 1 through 5 Eul, the claims on the loan certificate of 30,000,000 won on May 26, 199 stated that "it shall be paid at the time when there occurs an unexpected reason," the plaintiff and the defendant agreed on December 17, 199. The claim on the notarial deed on the notarial deed on January 21, 200 49, 200, 2000 won from February 28, 200 to December 30, 2007, the claims on the notarial deed on the notarial deed of 200,000 won were to be paid in installments over 82 times from December 30, 2007, the defendant did not immediately pay the remaining amount within the period of 10.4 billion won.

arrow