A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

around 08:40 on March 14, 2019, the Defendant driven Dsch Rexton car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.150% from approximately 300 meters to C front roads.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Reporting on detection of suspected victims of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving), reports on the circumstantial statements of the drivers of the driving of the driving of the motor vehicle, investigation reports (report on the circumstantial situations of the drivers of the driving of the motor vehicle), reports on the situation of the driving of the motor vehicle, and inquiry into

1. Determination as to the defendant's assertion of related photographs

1. The gist of the claim is that the Defendant did not drive under the influence of alcohol, only if he was found to have been seated in a car of Bosch Rexrothton at the time of detection.

2. On March 14, 2019, the police officer received the report of 112 that “the vehicle door is attached to the vehicle door on the side side of a middle school and is seated on the driver’s seat because there is no awareness that the vehicle door is sitting on, and the qui is absent,” which is acknowledged by each evidence that has undergone lawful examination of evidence, and the following circumstances acknowledged by the legitimate examination of evidence, and the police officer called out. ② The police officer called out because the vehicle trial operation was turned on at the time of the detection of the vehicle, has set the stop of the vehicle, ③ the driver’s seat is open at the time of the detection, and the Defendant was locked with dancing in the driver’s seat.

In full view of the fact that a police officer is prone, 4 The detection point is a road adjacent to a river that has been 300 meters away from the defendant's house (B) and there is no Schlage that can drink in the neighborhood, 50 meters away from the 850m away from the her house to the her house, and 50m away from the her vehicle, the defendant is asserting that he/she dices by drinking and drinking in the vehicle, but the vehicle does not seem to drink in the vehicle, the defendant can sufficiently recognize the charges of driving the vehicle after drinking in his/her house to the point of the accident.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 148-2(2) of the relevant Act and Article 148-2(2) of the former Road Traffic Act (amended by Act No. 16037, Dec. 24, 2018) regarding criminal facts.