Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Facts charged;
A. On June 26, 2015, at around 23:05, the Defendant became a vision with the Victim F (25 years) on the ground that the Victim F (25 years old) who was driven by the Defendant’s workplace while driving a car in the middle of the car driven by E, which is the Defendant’s workplace, did not turn on the car in the middle of the car driven by the Defendant’s workplace, became a vision with the Victim F (F).
After allowing the victim F to get off from the vehicle, the Defendant took a bath to “Chewing kis”, and assaulted the victim’s side, such as the victim’s hair, one time as his head.
B. The Defendant: (a) reported to the police at the above date, time, and place; and (b) expressed to the Victim G (22) who is the dynamics of F, who drive away from the Defendant, who is the birth of F (22 years old), who is the birth of F (22 years old); and (c) assaulted the victim G’s left side knife at one time in his hand.
2. On May 10, 2016, following the institution of a public prosecution for non-violation of intention to make a judgment (Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act), a written agreement stating the intent of non-performance of punishment for victim G on May 18, 2016, and a ruling dismissing a public prosecution to submit an agreement stating the intent of non-performance of punishment for victim F on May 18, 2016 (Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act).