logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.07.14 2016고정589
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is a person driving a BSP car.

On January 28, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car at around 22:20, and proceeded the frontway D in Gwangju Northern-gu C from the fire department of the fire department of the northwest to the new airbane. On January 28, 2016, the Defendant proceeded at a speed that is difficult to identify three lanes and two lanes from the fourth lane of the 4-lane road in the order of width.

Since a vehicle line is installed and the passage of ordinary vehicles is frequent, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely proceed by reducing the speed when changing course and giving prior notice of change of the lane in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused a scoo vehicle to the right-hand side of the victim E (46) driving in F, which proceeds from the rapid change of the two-lanes in the same direction as the coo vehicle due to the negligence of the rapid change of the lane, and then damaged the ccoo vehicle in the above amount of KRW 4,253,820 to the victim G (48) who was on the left-hand side of the scoo vehicle, followed the above coo vehicle by taking into account the upper-hand side part of the scoo vehicle, and suffered from the coo vehicle in need of two-day medical treatment for the above victim and the victim G (48 tax) on the above coo vehicle.

2. The decision dismissing a public prosecution pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, which states the purport of the victim G and E’s non-exclusive provision of punishment on May 24, 2016, following the institution of public prosecution (the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents), on June 30, 2016;

arrow