logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.02.07 2017가단11387
청구이의
Text

1. The Defendant’s notary public against the Plaintiffs has the executive force of No. 800, 2013.

Reasons

1. The indication of the claim: The defendant applied for a collection order based on the authentic copy of a notarial deed with the executory power of No. 800 in 2013, where a notary public applied for the seizure and collection order of claims against the plaintiffs as the debtor based on the original copy of the notarial deed with the power of No. 800 in the modern notarial deed No. 2013, which was issued by the defendant, but the above court was sentenced to the dismissal of all the defendant's claims against the plaintiffs, and therefore the compulsory execution based on the above authentic copy of the notarial deed should be dismissed.

2. Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);

arrow