logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2018.01.09 2017고정419
위증등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who works as a brokerage assistant at the office of "D Authorized Brokerage Agent" located in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Masan-si C.

1. No certified judicial broker, brokerage assistant, etc. for commencement of authorized judicial breach, shall receive any money and valuables in excess of the remuneration or actual expenses under any pretext, such as case, donation, etc.;

Nevertheless, on October 1, 2016, the Defendant received KRW 10 million from E as intermediary remuneration on the same day, even though he/she received KRW 4.80,000,000,000,000 from E, by mediating a contract under which the buyer purchases Muyang-gu G, H site and ground buildings from the seller F to purchase the sale price of KRW 520,000,000,000,000.

As a result, the Defendant received money exceeding the remuneration limit.

2. At around 15:30 on May 24, 2017, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the registration case on ownership transfer No. 101174, the said court 2016 was to take an oath, and to testify.

Defendant 1, on October 10, 200, the remaining payment date of the Plaintiff’s agent, referred that the Plaintiff would not enter into this contract by visiting the witness’s office. However, the Plaintiff agreed that the Plaintiff would not enter into this contract until the end.

Haba도요

The plaintiff stated "..." in the question of "," and "the plaintiff did not have a call with a witness on October 10, and there is no fact that he visited the witness's office." At the end, the plaintiff went to the witness's office on October 10.

“Top.” was written as “top.”.

However, on October 10, 2016, the Defendant did not call with E, the Plaintiff, or divided the above contents into conversations, and there was no fact that E visited the real estate office where the Defendant works on the above date.

This is based on the law of the defendant.

arrow