A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 11, 2016, around 14:50, the Defendant appeared at the Seoul Southern District Court No. 309, the Seoul Southern District Court located in 386, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, as a witness, and 2016 and 888, as a witness, to be notified of the right to refuse to testify and the punishment for perjury, and subsequently arranged the Defendant.

“In response to the questions of the defense counsel”.

Defendant C served daily on D real estate from November 2014 to February 2015, 2015.

In addition, we will answer the questions of the defense counsel, " whatever needs."

“The answer was made.”

However, in fact C has used the defendant's office only when he/she performs his/her brokerage business using the defendant's "Dauthorized Brokerage Office" name, and did not work every day at the defendant's office.

Nevertheless, the Defendant made a false statement as above and perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. The protocol of interrogation of each police officer in relation to E and C;

1. Copies of the third trial records;

1. Copies of each protocol of examination of witness to A and E;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes of A or E to a record recording statement;

1. Relevant Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Although C, who is qualified as a certified broker for the reasons of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, performed brokerage services using the office operated by the defendant, it is not good that the crime is committed in that it interferes with the discovery of the truth of the judiciary by making false statements as a witness who has taken an oath under the law even though he did not work every day at a certain time.

However, the sentence was determined by comprehensively taking into account the fact that the defendant has not been punished as his previous forces, the defendant's age, sex, circumstances after the crime, etc. and various sentencing conditions shown in the changed theory.

order for any reason above.