logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2012.11.13 2012고단652
무고
Text

Defendant

B shall be punished by a fine not exceeding 1.5 million won.

Defendant

B Where the above fine is not paid, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 18, 201, the Defendant interfered with Defendant B’s duties, on the grounds that the victim A (Nam and 45 years of age) was satisfed in the middle of the passengers on the taxi platform before the Esata in front of the police box of Sejong-si on December 18, 2011, the Defendant means that, in order to comply with the foregoing, the victim A (Seoul and 45 years of age) was able to take a taxi on the Defendant’s taxi platform and drive away the victim’s taxi, the Defendant refers to a large voice that “if the victim was on the taxi platform, she is on board the taxi?” The victim was on board the taxi of the victim, who was on board the victim’s taxi, to “I are on board the taxi, with a view to getting off the taxi or getting off the taxi.” The Defendant obstructed the victim’s taxi driver’s duty by using the victim’s vehicle in front of the victim’s vehicle in front of the victim’s vehicle in front of the taxi.

2. On December 26, 201, Defendant B submitted a letter of complaint to the racing police station located in Dongdong-dong on December 26, 201, stating that “A, before the taxi platform, on December 20, 201, on which a taxi loaded a taxi, opened the entrance of a taxi in front of the taxi platform and opened the entrance by a person A, who was on board a taxi, with the wind, was faced with the wind that goes beyond the ground and suffers from injury, such as salt, tension, etc., in need of medical treatment for about 14 days.”

However, there was no fact that A had opened a taxi entrance at the time, and the defendant, who had opened a door to get off the taxi, but was in front of the door, was only the defendant, who was accused of the complaint by a minor assault from Pyeongtaek A, and was against intentionally and intentionally.

As a result, the defendant did not go against A with the aim of being subject to criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s part.

arrow