1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff (C) was appointed as a police officer on June 12, 199 and was promoted to the police officer on February 1, 2014. From April 7, 2015 to October 9, 2016, the Plaintiff (C) served at the Seoul Special Metropolitan Police Agency B police station (hereinafter “B police station”) investigation and intelligence team, and served at the B police station police station from October 10, 2016 to the B police station.

B. Around 22:00 on September 20, 2016, the Plaintiff first visited the news coverage room office by the Korea Probationer D (hereinafter “the instant probationer”) while working on duty at the office of the intelligence criminal investigation team of the B police station, and the Plaintiff dialogueed for about 40 minutes with the instant probationer.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant dialogue”). C.

On October 7, 2016, the Defendant received a call from the part of the Korean Japan, stating that the Plaintiff made a statement that would cause a sense of sexual humiliation to the trainee of the instant case during the instant dialogue, and that the Defendant would demand a apology and make a decision on whether to report later.

On October 10, 2016, Korea Japan had conducted internal inspections upon the request of the Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency for inspection, investigation, and disciplinary action against the plaintiff. As a result, the defendant requested the General Disciplinary Committee for Police Officers at B police Station (hereinafter referred to as the "Disciplinary Committee of this case") on the 18th day of the same month (hereinafter referred to as the "Disciplinary Committee of this case") to make a decision on disciplinary action against the plaintiff for the following reasons.

- On September 20, 2016, the Plaintiff, alone, at around 22:08 on September 20, 2016, said that: (a) the Plaintiff, on duty at the Intelligent Criminal Investigation Team, 20 years of age (at least 24 years of age), made the instant interner under the age of 20 years of age who visited the news gathering office, makes the instant trainee feel a sense of sexual humiliation, thereby impairing the police officer’s dignity; and (b) said, “B” would mislead the reporters:

The other side of the plaintiff should be aware of the other party, and the other side of the plaintiff had been sexually indecently committed by them as to whether they were the other party or not;

The subject of this case is the subject of this case.