Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 200,000 won.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who works for a day at the head of a fisheries cooperative.

The unemployment benefits refers to the job-seeking subsidy for the period of active re-employment with intent and ability to work due to inevitable causes, such as managerial dismissal at a workplace subject to employment insurance, and for the 18-month period prior to this job-seeking period, in order to be eligible for employment insurance benefits, the insured worker shall obtain the eligibility for employment benefits if he/she receives education to re-employment in a state of non-employment without being employed despite having the intent and ability to work as a retired person regardless of his/her will and ability. On December 17, 2015, around 10:00, at the office in charge of unemployment benefits at the office in charge of unemployment benefits at the 39-Seoul Regional Employment Agency branch office of the 39-Seoul Regional Employment and Labor Agency, the Defendant did not meet the requirements for unemployment benefits and instead did not meet the requirements for unemployment benefits, and submitted an application for unemployment benefits to the effect that he/she would make a fraudulent and unemployed employment to ensure re-employment.

3. up to September 3, 196 received unemployment benefits of KRW 43,000 per day in the Agricultural Cooperative D account.

Summary of Evidence

1. A criminal investigation intelligence report;

1. Sending a list of the hearts of the wrongful recipients;

1. Application of relevant Acts and subordinate statutes, such as details of supply of and demand for unfair supply and demand;

1. Article 116 (2) of the relevant Act concerning criminal facts, Article 116 of the Insurance Act concerning selective employment of sentence, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Since the judgment on the assertion of Defendant A and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was made on March 9, 2016, Defendant A merely received unemployment benefits in accordance with relevant Acts and subordinate statutes, and did not receive unemployment benefits by fraud or other improper means.

However, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, Defendant A F. E in the former North Korea-gun on March 9, 2016.