A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 2, 2014, the Defendant reported that “C” office located in Permanent Residence B, around 11:55 on July 2, 2014, the Defendant: (a) reported that “A victim D (the age of 31) who was a multilateral employee who delivered coffee followed coffee; and (b) reported that “I have no answer to ask whether I have come to a white panty, but I have neglected it; (c) I would like to see that the victim “I have no answer; and (d) I would like to see that I would have come to her face; and (d) I would like to see that the victim’s hand would come to her face “I have come to her opening, chewing years, and the police, and that I would have reported to her face”; and (d) when I would like to see the victim’s falth of balp with one hand, salp the victim’s balle to the bottom, and enter the part of the victim’s body on the table.

As a result, the defendant suffered an injury to the victim by saving the left-hand side of the traditional music that requires medical treatment for about two weeks, and by cutting off the left-hand side of the right-hand side.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (STV video image verification), and to report internal investigation (Attachment to a medical certificate for injury);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment (in consideration of the fact that there are several records of the same kind of crime), and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing [the range of recommending sentence] under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the fact that a person appears in a white and reflect attitude, the fact that a full agreement is made with the victim, etc.) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Da1548, Apr. 2, 201) is considered as follows: In cases where a person subject to special mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Da1548, Apr. 2, 2011);