beta
Plaintiff, Appellant
Korean Bank (Attorney Jeon Soo-soo, Counsel for the defendant-appellant)
Defendant, appellant and appellant
The head of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (Attorney Kim Chang-ho et al., Counsel for the defendant-appellant
Conclusion of Pleadings
July 15, 2005
The first instance judgment
Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2004Guhap29665 delivered on December 14, 2004
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1. Purport of claim
The Defendant’s imposition disposition of KRW 884,400,000 against the Plaintiff on April 10, 200 shall be revoked.
2. Purport of appeal
The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;
The reasoning of the judgment of the court concerning this case is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is citing this in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Conclusion
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.
Judges Kim Nung-hwan (Presiding Judge)