A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 1, 2014, at around 02:50 on June 1, 2014, the Defendant was forced to d and satisf with other customers, and d and satisfed with ebbbage, and was dispatched after being reported to satched, the Defendant was released from the guard F of the police box belonging to the Jinhae Police Station Emba, which was called.

Accordingly, the Defendant received the left parts of the above F with the back part of the head of the Defendant’s head.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on civil petition handling.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the law No. 1 to 3 of the evidence list submitted by the prosecutor

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The fact that the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order is confirmed to reflect and reflect the reasons for sentencing, the fact that it appears to be an contingent crime, and the degree of assault against police officers is not serious, and the sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing Commission [the basic area of obstruction of performance of official duties (6 to 14 months)], etc. shall be taken into account;