The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one year and two months of imprisonment, three years of probation, probation, community service order, and additional collection) is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case is deemed to have been committed under the unfavorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant purchased phiphones and purchased phiphones and that part of the phiphones was administered, and that the defendant again committed the crime of this case despite the fact that he had the record of being punished once again despite the fact that he had been punished for the same crime. Meanwhile, the defendant led to the crime of this case, which is not good to the health of the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant has committed the crime of this case, cooperation in the investigation of narcotics, and the fact that there is a disease such as liveration, etc., and the defendant seems to have tried to operate the public corporation and faithfully after being sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment with prison labor for the violation of the Narcotics Control Act, 2010, 3 years of imprisonment with prison labor for the purpose of administering the public corporation and faithfully after being sentenced to 2 years of suspended sentence, and the defendant cannot be seen to have purchased phiphones for the purpose of selling them to others: the extent of recommendations by the Supreme Court for the punishment of this case.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so ordered.