All appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The court's explanation concerning this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the judgment by this court under paragraph (2) of this Article, and therefore, it shall accept this as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

2. The plaintiffs asserts that this Court's additional decision in this Court is grounds for appeal that "the plaintiffs shall fall under the category of stateless persons under international law due to the disposition in this case, and cannot conduct financial transactions within the Republic of Korea, and the exercise of property rights, which have been formed by nationals of the Republic of Korea, shall be prevented at source. This is against the principle of trust protection and the principle of proportionality, and thus, has violated the discretionary power."

The above assertion by the plaintiffs in this court is not different from the contents of the plaintiffs' assertion in the first instance court, and the first instance court's rejection of the plaintiffs' assertion is justified even if all the evidence submitted in the first instance court were examined.

3. Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance that dismissed the plaintiffs' claim based on this conclusion is justifiable. Thus, the plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.