All appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs;

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except to add the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the

2. 이 법원에서 고쳐쓰는 부분 ▣ 제1심판결서 제4쪽 제9행의 “원고가”를 “원고들이”로 고친다.

3. The Plaintiffs added to this Court asserts that, as the grounds for appeal by this Court, “if the Plaintiffs return to the People’s Republic of China that is a nationality country, there is a very high risk of gambling due to the reasons that they were full-time believerss, and thus, the Plaintiffs asserted that there is a sufficient ground for persecution.”

The above assertion by the plaintiffs in this court is not different from the contents of the plaintiffs' assertion in the first instance court. The first instance court's decision rejecting the plaintiffs' assertion on the grounds as cited above, even after examining all the evidence submitted in the first instance court.

4. Conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims are without merit.

In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance that dismissed all the plaintiffs' claims is justifiable, and all appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed without merit, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing plaintiffs.