1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Plaintiff corresponding to the following additional payment order shall be revoked.

1. Basic facts

A. With respect to A vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff vehicle”), the Defendant is an insurer who has concluded each automobile insurance contract with respect to B vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

B. On March 2, 2017, at around 18:20, the Defendant’s vehicle entered the front side of the Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “instant side road”) at the network of the network original distance, and subsequently, according to the straight margin signal, the front side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle that passed the said intersection from the left side of the running direction of the Defendant’s vehicle to the front side of the Defendant’s front part of the Defendant vehicle, following the straight margin signal.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

On March 16, 2017, the Plaintiff paid insurance proceeds of KRW 1,016,614 at the repair cost of the Plaintiff’s vehicle with respect to the instant accident.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entries in Gap evidence 2 through 4, images, the purport of whole pleadings

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's claim

A. The following circumstances revealing the occurrence and scope of liability for damages and the purport of the entire arguments and the evidence revealed as seen earlier. At the time of the instant accident, the Plaintiff’s vehicle was passing through the said intersection in accordance with the straight line of the vehicle. The instant side road is located between the evisde road and the evisde road from the evisde road to the evisde road. The instant side road can proceed to the evisde road from the evisde road to the evisde road before the said intersection. The instant accident occurred when the Defendant’s vehicle entered the instant side road to the evisde road and the said intersection. In light of the fact that the Defendant’s vehicle was a vehicle stop signal at the time of entering the said intersection from the instant side road to the said intersection, the instant accident occurred when the Defendant’s vehicle went to the right side road as alleged by the Defendant.