logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2018.05.18 2018고정42
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The accused is a person who is engaged in driving of Cpops vehicles in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Road Traffic Act;

At around 10:40 on June 21, 2017, the Defendant parked the above vehicle on the front road located in Gyeong-gun, Jinnam-gun, and continued to drive the vehicle behind the 2th square in order to depart from the direction of the square.

At this point, the rear side is an intersection where the passage of a vehicle is frequent, so in such a case, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by safely driving the vehicle in the rear side due to the passage of the vehicle after the rear, etc. of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected his duty of care and neglected the duty of care in the future, and neglected to discover the Gunst Vehicle of the victim F (V, 58 years old) in the course of the crime in the new market from the 2 plaza on the right side of the vehicle moving back to the new market due to the negligence of the Defendant’s occupational negligence, and instead neglected the duty of care in the future, thereby resulting in the Defendant’s failure to detect the said Poter Cargo, and received even the back part of the back part of the damaged party’s left side of the vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant caused the above victim to suffer injuries to salt and tensions that require approximately two weeks of treatment by occupational negligence, and at the same time destroyed the above rocketing vehicle to cover repair costs equivalent to KRW 2,273,725.

2. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation shall operate any motor vehicle, etc. on a road which is not mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, Defendant 1 driven C Poter Cargo Vehicles not covered by mandatory insurance, as described in the foregoing paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A H statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a report on the actual condition of the accident, a survey report on the scene of the accident, a next inquiry, a medical certificate (H), or a written inquiry about non-liability insurance, and a statement of repair cost estimate;

1. Criminal facts;

arrow