Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who owns B Poter Cargo Vehicles.

No motor vehicle which is not covered by the mandatory insurance of motor vehicles shall be operated on a road.

Nevertheless, on October 10, 2016, the defendant operated the above cargo vehicle which did not have the front road C at the time of the Government of Gyeonggi-do, with the automobile mandatory insurance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiries about mandatory insurance and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to information about non-performance of mandatory insurance;

1. Relevant Article 46 of the Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 46 (2) 2 and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Compensation for Motor Vehicle Damages, and Selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act lies in the circumstance that the defendant scrapped the vehicle after the crime of this case. However, the defendant seems to continue to operate the vehicle under the name of the corporation even after the closure of the business as a representative of the corporation, and even if he had been punished by a fine several times for the same crime, he/she repeats the crime, the amount of fine under the summary order cannot be deemed to be excessive, and thus, the punishment as set forth in the order shall