beta
Text
1. 피고는 원고에게 별지 목록 기재 부동산 중 별지 도면 표시 ㉠, ㉡, ㉢, ㉣, ㉠의 각 점을...
Reasons
1. 기초사실 원고가 2016. 11. 18. 피고에게 별지 목록 기재 부동산 중 별지 도면 표시 ㉠, ㉡, ㉢, ㉣, ㉠의 각 점을 순차 연결한 선내 ㈎ 부분 19.8㎡(이하 ‘이 사건 주택’이라 한다)를 임대차보증금 400,000원, 월 차임 100,000원(매월 30일 지급), 임대차기간 2016. 11. 17.부터 2019. 11. 16.까지 36개월로 정하여 임대하고, 그 무렵 피고에게 이 사건 주택을 인도한 사실, 피고가 2019. 3. 31. 이후의 차임을 지급하지 않고 있는 사실은 당사자 사이에 다툼이 없고, 원고가 2기 이상의 차임 연체를 이유로 위 임대차계약을 해지한다는 의사표시가 담긴 이 사건 소장부본이 2019. 6. 3. 피고에게 송달된 사실은 기록상 명백하다.
2. Determination as to the cause of action
A. According to the above facts, the above lease contract was terminated on June 3, 2019 and terminated. Thus, the defendant is obligated to deliver the house of this case to the plaintiff.
B. Meanwhile, there is no dispute between the parties regarding the fact that the Defendant occupied and used the instant house until the day after the termination of the said lease, and it is ratified that the rent corresponding to unjust enrichment after the termination of the lease was KRW 100,000,000, monthly rent for the instant house. As such, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the unpaid rent or unjust enrichment equivalent to the amount of rent not paid at the rate of KRW 100,000 per month from March 31, 2019 to the day the delivery of the instant house is completed, and the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the amount of unjust enrichment at the rate of KRW 400,000 from the lease deposit to the Defendant from March 31, 2019 to July 30, 2019 to the day when the lease deposit to be returned to the Plaintiff or the amount of unjust enrichment equivalent to the unpaid rent from March 31, 209 to July 30, 2019.
3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case.