logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.10.30 2019가단5515
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

B. From February 13, 2019, 550,000 won to above.

Reasons

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, the plaintiff, on February 2, 2017, may recognize the fact that the plaintiff requested the defendant to deliver the house of this case by notifying the defendant on February 12, 2019, that the lease deposit is KRW 10 million, KRW 500,000 per month, KRW 50,000 per month, and KRW 13,000 per month, and KRW 13,000 from February 13, 2017 to February 12, 2019.

According to the above facts, since the lease of the instant house has expired on February 12, 2019, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the said house to the Plaintiff, and to pay the Plaintiff the amount of unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent calculated by the rate of KRW 500,000 per month from February 12, 2019 to February 12, 2019 (=50,000 won x 11 months) and from February 13, 2019 to February 13, 2019 to the date the delivery of the said house is completed.

Therefore, we decide to accept the plaintiff's claim and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow