1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. On December 5, 2016, this Court has regard to cases of application for suspension of compulsory execution by this Court.

The Plaintiff asserts that a compulsory execution based on the executive title against B should not be permitted on the ground that the movables listed in the attached attachment list (hereinafter “the instant corporeal movables”) are the co-property of the Plaintiff and C.

According to the evidence evidence Nos. 1 and 3, the plaintiff completed the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of the plaintiff on November 30, 2015 with respect to the building where the corporeal movables in this case were executed, the plaintiff shall be acknowledged as having a legal marital relationship with C. On the other hand, the above evidence and the evidence No. 2, and the whole purport of pleading as follows, i.e., one child between B and B, and the above execution place was registered as the resident registration of the above execution place from November 27, 2015 to August 25, 2016. In light of the above facts, it is difficult to recognize that the corporeal movables in this case were co-property of the plaintiff and his spouse, and there is no other evidence to recognize them otherwise.

If so, the plaintiff's claim is without merit, and it is dismissed.