1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. On January 11, 2019, this Court has regard to cases where a request for suspension of compulsory execution is filed by this Court.

1. Basic facts

A. On December 19, 2018, the Defendant: (a) based on the executory payment order certified by the Seoul Western District Court Decision 2018Hu14003, the Defendant seized D’s corporeal movables listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant corporeal movables”) to the Ulsan District Court E.

B. The Plaintiff is the mother of D.

[Grounds for recognition] The descriptions of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 5, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is that the instant corporeal movables are owned by the Plaintiff, not D, and thus, a compulsory execution against the instant corporeal movables ought to be denied.

B. It is insufficient to recognize that the instant corporeal movables were owned by the Plaintiff only with the descriptions of the judgment health room, Gap evidence Nos. 3 and 4, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise, the Plaintiff’s above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.