logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2019.12.18 2018구단10333
유족급여 및 장의비 부지급처분취소 청구의
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On July 15, 2016, B, the Plaintiff’s spouse, became a member of the Plaintiff Company C, and performed duties such as the maintenance and repair of the production equipment of the LED press, the overall process of production, and the replacement of parts.

B. At around 06:00 on July 28, 2017, B: (a) died of an acute shock, a heart shock, or a parosis, from around 18:00 on August 3, 2017, while being transferred to an E hospital and being treated for treatment after having scambling scam at home.

(hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”). (c)

On January 15, 2018, the Plaintiff filed a claim with the Defendant for the payment of survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses by asserting that the deceased’s death constitutes occupational accidents. On March 8, 2018, the Defendant rendered a disposition on the survivors’ benefits and funeral site-based compensation (hereinafter “instant disposition”) against the Plaintiff to the effect that “the deceased may not be verified by a short-term course and chronic fault, and, on the part of the deceased, a sudden and unexpected circumstance to the extent that the deceased’s death was caused by acute emerculation, etc., or because stress caused by changes in the business environment is not objectively confirmed, and thus, there is no proximate causal relation between the deceased’s work and the deceased’s death.”

[Grounds for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 4, Eul evidence 1 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. On July 8, 2017, the Plaintiff asserted that he worked in the production site where most of the hours of a day was not available for a separate resting room, and meals were not available during working hours, and human resources were placed in an inferior working environment where the lack of human resources was placed. On July 8, 2017, the Plaintiff was hospitalized on the right-hand kne, and was hospitalized for about two weeks on the bridge, and then went to work for an excessive work.

As above, the deceased has a extreme tension due to work.

arrow