Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On June 13, 2017, at around 23:50, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s main store business by force by force, such as “D main points” operated by the victim C in Ansan-si, A, a member state store B, on the ground that the drinking value is not high.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of C’s written laws and regulations

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 314 (1) of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment;

1. At the time of the facts charged, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s main store business by force, such as holding a Qua New Market at the time of the judgment.

2. It is not sufficient to acknowledge the fact that the Defendant had mer new plate at the time solely based on the judgment scam, investigation report (on-site CCTV image verification), and on-site CCTV CDs, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Therefore, this part of the facts charged should be pronounced not guilty by the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act because it constitutes a case where there is no proof of a crime. However, inasmuch as it is found that the facts charged with a single crime are guilty, the judgment of innocence shall not be