1. The Plaintiff, Defendant B, Defendant C, Defendant C, Defendant C, KRW 593,90, and Defendant D, KRW 927,990, and each of them on June 2016.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Seo-gu, Daejeon (hereinafter “instant building”) is an aggregate building of the third and sixth stories underground, which was opened on September 3, 1994.

The Plaintiff is the owner of the instant shopping mall No. F, Defendant B, and Defendant C, respectively, and Defendant D is the owner of the instant shopping mall No. h, and Defendant D is the owner of the instant shopping mall No. 1 located in the instant shopping mall.

B. The Jun Young-gu Association (hereinafter referred to as the “Nong-gu Association”) is an organization composed of shop occupants of the instant commercial building. K management body (hereinafter referred to as the “management body”) is a management body under the Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings, composed of sectional owners of the instant commercial building (hereinafter referred to as the “Building Act”).

The progress of dispute surrounding the right to manage the commercial building of this case is as shown in the attached Form.

C. On August 9, 2015, the Plaintiff received the designation of 1/29 or more of 252 occupant occupants of the instant commercial building, and reported to the head of the relevant superstore operator on August 9, 2015. On August 12, 2015, the head of the relevant district office accepted the said report and issued a written confirmation to the Plaintiff.

The Plaintiff filed a report with the head of the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul, upon meeting the reporting requirements, on February 24, 2016, and the head of the Seo-gu in the wartime reported to the head of the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul, on August 30, 2016, March 2, 2017; on September 7, 2017; and on March 8, 2018, the Plaintiff received each of the above reports and issued a written confirmation of the superstore manager to the Plaintiff.

On January 29, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit with the Daejeon District Court Decision 2015Gahap100697, which sought confirmation that the management body had the right to impose and collect the management fees of the instant commercial building, and obtained a favorable judgment. The management body appealed and appealed, but the said judgment became final and conclusive as it is.

E. From August 2015 to April 2016, the Plaintiff reported as a superstore manager of the instant commercial building, Defendant B: (a) KRW 1,024,320 in total of management expenses; (b) KRW 593,90 in total of management expenses; and (c) Defendant D in total of management expenses.