logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.06.01 2016고정746
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant: (a) was a person who operates a sexual traffic business establishment under the trade name “C” under the name of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B 1605; and (b) D received KRW 100,000 per day from the said business establishment and served as an employee who received the price for sexual traffic from the customers and provides guidance to the place of sexual traffic.

At around 18:42 on October 14, 2015, the Defendant, in collusion with D, received 140,000 won from the customers whose name is unknown at the said “C” sexual traffic business establishment, and had E, an employee of the said business establishment, engage in sexual intercourse, thereby arranging sexual intercourse, as well as arranging sexual intercourse. From October 6, 2015 to October 23:20, 2015, the Defendant, in collusion with D, received 1.20,00 won from many unspecified men at the same place to receive 1.5,00 won from the price of sexual intercourse with E, an employee of the said business establishment, and had them do sexual intercourse with E, a sexual intercourse.

F, “G” sexual traffic business establishments at the address of the above address, received monthly wage of KRW 1,80,000,000 from customers and served as an employee who received sexual traffic prices from customers and provides guidance to sexual traffic business places.

On January 13, 2016, the Defendant, in collusion with F on January 13, 2016, arranged commercial sex acts in collusion with F, by receiving KRW 1.60,00 from an unspecified male customer via F, an employee of the said business, and by allowing H, an employee of the said business, to engage in commercial sex acts by using the mixed sea. From January 4, 2016 to January 14, 2016, the Defendant arranged commercial sex acts against unspecified customers at the same place, thereby allowing them to engage in commercial sex acts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D, E, F, and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs and photographs taken over the business place, etc.;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of Sexual Traffic, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and selection of fines for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70 of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

arrow