The accused shall publicly announce the summary of the judgment of innocence.

1. On April 8, 2012, the Defendant: (a) was a person engaged in accommodation business with the trade name, Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, and (b) had three juveniles (in women, 15 years of age) and E, etc. accommodated in the 501 room in the above Maurel; and (c) had the juvenile take a e-mail accommodation against the juvenile.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant and his defense counsel asserted to the effect that the Defendant merely knew that they were accommodated in the telecom at the time when they were accommodated in the telecom, but did not know that they were accommodated in the telecom. As such, the Defendant asserted to the effect that the Defendant cannot recognize the criminal intent for sexual intercourse.

B. The records of this case show the following facts: ① on April 8, 2012, E, one male with no name, and D paid the protection value to the defendant in the guide room at the entrance of the victim; ② at the time when the above E, etc. paid the protection value, ② at the time when E, one male with no name, and D were sent outside the guide room at the time of payment of the protection value, but D was written to the extent that the guidance room window was visible to the front face of the defendant; ③ at the time of the above E, the defendant was "three male with no name," and the defendant was "501," and the defendant did not have any evidence to acknowledge that there was a lack of face between D and the defendant.

3. In conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the summary of the judgment of the above defendant is publicly announced under Article 58(2) of the Criminal Act.