A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 01:05 on October 9, 2013, the Defendant: (a) discovered the victim B (n) who was fleeped within the main point of “D” located in Asan-si, Asan-si; and (b) without any justifiable reason, purchased the victim’s head debt from the second floor to the first floor; (c) calculated the victim’s face by drinking; (d) continuously walked the victim’s head debt at a number of times; and (e) continuously taken the victim’s head debt on the top of the said main point; (e) took the victim’s face on the top of the said main point; and (e) took the flick body of the victim’s flick and the flicked on the floor to the point of the flive body of the flive to the point of flishing; and (e) took part in the victim’s flick and the body of the flive body to the point of their flishing.

2. The Defendant suffered injury to the victim E, without any reason, at the same time and place as in the above paragraph (1) above, and without any reason, suffered injury, such as the opening of the right side register, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment by walking the victim E (n, 19 years of age) so far from twice. The Defendant saw the right hand hand hand to the upper right part of the glass part that was shouldered on the floor while going beyond the victim, and led to the injury such as the opening of the right side register.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement of B and E;

1. On-site photographs, damaged photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with labor for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Considering the fact that the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act is not good in light of the method and content of the crime of this case, and that the damage caused by the crime is not considerable, the Defendant’s liability is unlimited, but it is against the Defendant’s agreement with the victim B with a large amount of damage, and there is no other criminal record in addition to the fine, it is also ordered as ordered.