The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The defendant's mistake is recognized and reflected in his judgment.

The running period of the instant sexual traffic business is relatively short.

On the other hand, the court below also decided the punishment in consideration of such favorable circumstances.

The act of arranging sexual traffic is harmful to the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, and has great social harm.

On November 14, 2013, imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act was sentenced to ten months, and on May 31, 2014, the crime of this case was committed even after the execution of the sentence was completed, despite the existence of a repeated crime period.

In addition, when comprehensively taking into account the circumstances of the instant crime, the circumstances after the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, and environment, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too excessive and is not deemed unfair. Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.