logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.05.11 2016고단290
컴퓨터등사용사기방조
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months;

2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The victims of false names, by misrepresenting them to the public prosecutor's office's office's office's employees, obtained information on the account from the victims, and through entering such information without authority through Internet banking, etc., posted a notice to the effect that they would provide loans to the victims in order to obtain a third party's account necessary for the above crimes.

On May 31, 2015, the Defendant: (a) reported the above notice and discussed the loan by communicating the nameless person via telephone; (b) received a proposal from the Defendant to give KRW 3 million to the withdrawal of illegal washing money; (c) around June 1, 2015, around 08:50, the Defendant again confirmed the fact that (d) around 4, 2015, at the subway New Airport Disease Control Act No. 4, the name-free box, and (d) found the illegal money transferred from the Defendant’s name to the Defendant’s account, and (d) sought to pay the face value of the illegal money.

In addition, according to the same place, the business bank passbook in the name of the defendant prepared by the defendant, and the new bank passbook, family relation certificate, certified copy of resident registration, and identification card in the name of the defendant was issued to the person who was not the name of the defendant, and the person who was not the name was the person who used the mobile phone to use the mobile phone for the crime as follows and sent the photographs such as the account number of the above passbook, family relation certificate

As a result, the Defendant sent financial account information, etc. under the name of the Defendant to facilitate the commission of the crime even though he anticipated to commit the crime by the non-persons without a name, thereby preventing the fraud of using computers more than twice by the non-persons without a name, as follows.

1. On June 1, 2015, in response to the above conspiracys, the names of the victims of the crime against the victim C were phoneed to the victim C on June 1, 2015, and “Influence of financial information by accessing the D prosecutor’s office of the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor’s Office (hereinafter “Seoul Central Public Prosecutor’s Office”), and the victim was not the victim.”

arrow