logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2017.02.02 2016고단1997
사기방조
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Records of Crimes】 On April 21, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on August 29 of the same month by imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Registration of Loan Business, etc. and the Protection of Financial Users at the Daegu District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive and conclusive during the suspended sentence

【The name of the accused of the crime】 The accused of the crime committed the crime, by misrepresenting the prosecutor or investigator to many unspecified victims as a member of the telephone financial fraud (hereinafter “Sishing”), and soliciting them to receive money by inducing them to a phish site and inputting financial information as if they were involved in the fraud case and confirming whether they were accomplices.

The names of wounded noble persons shall be the C Prosecutor of the Seoul Northern District Prosecutors' Office on July 30, 2015, with a phone call from the 11:00 on July 30, 2015 to the victim B;

In order to confirm whether a new account is an accomplice in a financial fraud case, it is necessary to find all the deposits and deposit them into one account, and then make the victim deposit all the deposits into an enterprise bank account, enter the above enterprise bank account, the authorized ID and password, and theOTP number, etc. into the phishing site, leading the victim to enter all the deposits into the enterprise bank account, and transfer the above information to the account in the name of the defendant (new D) on the same day.

The Defendant, at around 13:40 on the same day, was arrested by the report of the employees of the bank and did not withdraw KRW 28 million in order to assist the Defendant, even though he/she knew that he/she received money from the damaged party by committing a crime of Bosing “ Bosing” at the new bank, etc. branch of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul.

Accordingly, the defendant could easily commit the crime of fraud of the non-persons without the name.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;

arrow