The defendant is innocent.

On June 4, 2010, the victim C, the creditor, attached the credit amount of KRW 70,000,000,000,000,000 of the credit amount of D, the guarantor of the joint and several interest of the defendant, by the ruling of provisional attachment of credit No. 3372 on June 4, 2010. On June 28, 2010, the victim C, the creditor, attached the credit amount of KRW 70,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.

In the face of the cancellation of provisional seizure, the State would transfer the 32,000 punishment among the clothing of Ireland which has been brought to it to her.

“......”

However, the defendant has already completed the settlement of debts with the victim.

In mind, the above false statement was made to cancel pressure only, and even if the victim intended to cancel the provisional attachment of the same child, there was no intention or ability to deliver 32,00 punishment for the clothes promised to do so.

Around July 7, 2010, the defendant deceivings the victim as above, and caused the victim to cancel the provisional attachment of the above claim, thereby allowing D to obtain pecuniary benefits equivalent to KRW 70 million.

Reasons for innocence

1. There is no evidence to prove that the defendant transferred 32,00 punishment as stated in the facts charged to F, in addition to the statements made by the victim's investigative agency and in this court, as alleged by the victim (the defendant delegated F with authority over customs clearance and sale)

2. The victim consistently asserts that “the Defendant had known about the transfer of the above 32,00 punishment to F at the time of the transfer to the victim of the above 32,00 punishment on June 28, 2010,” but the above legal statement is not trustable and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it otherwise.

Rather, the victim knew that F was delegated by the investigative agency to the sale of the above 32,00 punishments to F, and prepared as of May 23, 2010 retrospectively, and prepared as of May 32, 200.