logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 공주지원 2013.05.24 2012고단482
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who drives Cone Star Co., Ltd.

On November 21, 2012, the Defendant driven the above van at a speed of about 30 kilometers per hour from the front of the D upper point of public seat loan to the viewing side of the public seat loan at a speed of about 30 kilometers per hour.

At the time, since it is night and its width is narrow and narrow and bended to the right, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has the duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving the steering direction and brake system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and went into D's store located on the left side of the progress direction, and suffered injury, such as the victim E (at 48 years of age), victim F (at 20 years of age) and the victim E (at 8 years of age), which requires approximately 5 weeks of treatment to the victim E, and the victim E suffered injury, such as d's c's c's f's c's f's f's f's f's 8 days of age, and d's f's f's f's f's f'

2. On the date and time set forth in the above paragraph (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the Defendant was required to comply with the measurement of drinking alcohol by inserting approximately 30 minutes of the alcohol measuring instrument in a manner of inserting the breath of alcohol in a breath while under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling from slope G belonging to the public police station, smelling about the face, etc., after having paid the traffic accident as mentioned in the above Paragraph (1) above, as seen in the above paragraph (1).

그럼에도 피고인은 음주측정기에 입김을 불어 넣는 시늉만 하는 방법으로 이를 회피하여 정당한 사유 없이 경찰공무원의 음주측정요구에 응하지 아니하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of E, F, and H;

1. A traffic accident occurrence report;

1. A written report on host driver, a written report on the status of an employer driver, a written statement on the status of an employer, and a control manual;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Each relevant Article of the Act concerning criminal facts;

arrow