The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

At around 09:10 on September 26, 2013, the Defendant was engaged in driving C5 tons of cargo vehicles. Around 09:09:10, the Defendant loaded the above cargo vehicles, loaded the compacter, and left the e-mailer road located in the e-mailh-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-r.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D, F, G, and H;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Each on-site photograph, actual condition survey report, and comprehensive traffic accident analysis report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Penalty fine of 2,00,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won a day);

1. Although the Defendant was indicted as the perpetrator of the instant traffic accident under Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence, according to the results of the examination of evidence by this court, the Defendant cannot be said to have been negligent in neglecting his/her duty of care at all, but the Defendant’s negligence enters the intersection beyond the limited speed of the victim D.