1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s main claim is dismissed.

2. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) is KRW 19,900,000 against the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff).

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with CB damage insurance company (hereinafter “KB damage insurance”), and the Defendant is a person who entered into a liability insurance contract with the KB damage insurance company (hereinafter “KB damage insurance”). The Defendant is a person who entered into a liability insurance contract with the KB damage insurance company (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

B. At around 09:10 on September 26, 2013, E, the husband of the above B, driven the above vehicle F with F on the front line of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and left the border intersection in the Cheongyang-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-si, the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle was received as the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle with the front-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

Due to the instant accident, E was damaged by the rash of the left-hand pelle, etc. requiring medical treatment for approximately 12 weeks, F was damaged by the rash, the rash of the rash, the amount of root abandonment and the lava, etc., which was damaged by the Won and the Defendant vehicle, and the compacter who was loaded in the loading of the Defendant vehicle was destroyed by the shock.

The Plaintiff paid 60,644,170 won to E with medical expenses and agreed amount, and 41,191,430 won to F with medical expenses and agreed amount according to personal injury, according to the special agreement on non-insurance injury security, and paid 1,090,000 won to B at the repair cost of the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, and 8 (including branch numbers in the case of provisional evidence) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the main claim

A. In order to make the left turn from the point of the Plaintiff’s assertion to the left at the intersection by the method of passage at the 1st intersection, the crossing is within the intersection.