logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.08.25 2017고단2209
사기
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 1,400,00, and by a fine of KRW 700,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In order to obtain a loan, the Defendants carried out as if they were in a relative relationship with each other through Internet advertising, and Defendant A was the obligor, and Defendant B received a loan as the surety and used half of the loan in installments.

Defendant

A A around June 15, 2015, the injured party Woman Co., Ltd. at the Gu-U.S. Si around Dong-si.

The telephone call to the division and “Saris B requests the loan of joint and several sureties”, and Defendant B is the relative of Defendant A after receiving a telephone from the injured party and will be the guarantor of Defendant A.

The term "" refers to the following.

However, the facts are not related to the Defendants, and this part of the facts charged are contradictory to the facts stated in the above, which read as “the space that they became aware of through the Internet advertisement,” and in light of the context, it is the content of deception that it is not related to the relationship of friendship. Therefore, the facts charged are same as the above facts charged.

Defendant

A has been liable for 80 million won at the time and has been unable to obtain a loan due to lack of guarantor, and even if he has received a loan through the Internet advertisement to seek a guarantor, he did not have the intent or ability to repay the loan. The defendant B did not have the intention or ability to repay the loan if the defendant A fails to repay the loan.

The Defendants, as such, by deceiving the victim, received from the injured party the remittance of KRW 5,00,000 under the name of the loans from the Saemaul Treasury Account (C) of Defendant A at the time of the occurrence of the damage.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to deceive the victim, thereby deceiving 5,000,000 won from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A. A. a. copy of a loan contract for full consumption of gold, a copy of a joint and several guarantee contract;

arrow