1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The plaintiff in a labor relationship between early 1986 and February 2, 1988 was engaged in the business of building pestes in B Co., Ltd. in Busan, from March 198 to February 1992, the plaintiff was engaged in the business of attaching pestes from C Co., Ltd. to February 2, 1992, and entered D Co., Ltd. around August 1998 and worked as an official title at Fhigh School Construction Co., Ltd. conducted in E Co., Ltd. from around that time to September 22, 1999.

B. (1) On October 2, 1991, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the Busan National University Hospital as “Empiced Empiced Empiced Epics”. (2) On September 20, 1999, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the Plaintiff at the work site at the above FF High School and laid down on the floor at a height of 1.5 meters during the work, and her macked with severe pain. On May 19, 200, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the “Empicing Epics on both sides.”

After that, on August 20, 2004 and September 6, 2004, the term "the head of both sides dubal dubal dubal dubal dubalone is the part located above the connecting part of the dubal dubal and the dubal dubal dubal dubal."

(The name of each of the above diagnosis appears to be the same injury and disease; hereinafter referred to as the "the injury and disease of this case").

On September 24, 2001, the Plaintiff filed an application for medical care benefits with respect to the instant injury and disease with respect to the Defendant. However, on September 24, 2001, the Defendant rendered a non-approval disposition against the Plaintiff on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation with the business on September 24, 2001. (2) The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking the revocation of the said disposition on March 6, 2002, following the procedure for requesting a review on the non-approval disposition.

On November 13, 2003, the court of first instance sentenced the dismissal of the plaintiff's claim on the grounds that the injury or disease in this case cannot be recognized as an occupational accident. The plaintiff appealed against this, but the court of first instance declared the dismissal of the appeal on June 25, 2004.