beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Criminal facts
The defendant is a person who is engaged in the delivery day of over-day in 2015 order 2551.
In fact, the defendant did not transfer to a business entity managing a head office store, and even if he received a cell phone from the victims, the defendant had no intention or ability to return the cell phone, and had an approach to connect the victims with the part-time management of the head office store, and had the victims receive the part-time cell phone by borrowing it.
1. Around March 20, 2015, the Defendant committed the crime: (a) around March 20, 2015, around the composite terminal located in 1695-ro 30, as the Dong-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon; (b) around March 20, 2015, the Defendant sent the victim C with a statement that he/she seeks a part-time set through the cell phone holder “Stockholm” among the police officers in March 2015, to the above place, and (c) the victim “A is the former part of the business that manages a number of head office units located in Daejeon, which is located in Daejeon, and will do so by holding the part-time store inventory management. However, in order to obtain a part-time set, the Defendant shall have a new cell phone opened, and leave the cell phone to B, a mobile phone that remains after deducting a conviction as a security for identity verification, should return the cell phone, and all of the expenses related thereto should be paid.”
The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, had the victim open a cell phone of “Aphone 6 flus” at the SK Telecom store in its surrounding areas, and acquired it by using one cell phone of the amounting to KRW 966,00 at the market price at which the core chips are removed from the seat.
2. On April 7, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around April 7, 2015, entered the place indicated in paragraph (1) at around April 7, 2015; (b) on April 4, 2015, inserted the victim B, who inserted a phrase to seek tebrate through the Mebrateing Meba using the cell phone-type display method, and said the victim B to the same effect as described in paragraph (1).
As above, the defendant deceivings the victim and causes him to do so.