beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
From September 30, 2013, the Defendant is a person who operates a private teaching institute with the trade name of “C” located in B and 7th century.
While operating the above private teaching institute, the Defendant did not have any record of being delegated with the duties to apply for a test for the qualifying examination for 1 and 2nd degree of coffee and to issue a certificate of qualification.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, who completed the completion to an unspecified number of students, issued a certificate of a coffee cook with the same as he/she was delegated with the pertinent duties to the Development Institute, and was willing to obtain the application fees and tuition fees therefor.
1. On December 2015, the Defendant: (a) even though he did not have the right to issue a private qualification certificate issued by “D” as above, the Defendant: (b) requested that “D, the printing agent of the said private teaching institute, obtain a certificate of qualification in the same form as “in the form of this,” and forged F’s name, serial number, etc. sent on the note used by the E on March 8, 2016; and (c) forged D’s license for coffee cooking in the name of “D” for the purpose of exercising the same as written in the list of crimes (1) from around that time to July 21, 2019.
2. On March 2016, the Defendant: (a) sent the group text “A certificate has been issued to a student F, who is aware of the forgery at the said private teaching institute; (b) sent to a student F, etc. who was found to be a private teaching institute at the time of correspondence; and (c) delivered a forged coffee certificate to F, as if he were a document was duly formed, as described in the foregoing paragraph (1) at the time on March 25, 2016; and (d) exercised it from that time to July 25, 2019, as indicated in the attached Table No. 1 to 132, the Defendant issued a forged coffee certificate to the students.
3. The Defendant is guilty.