logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.07.13 2016나75731
건물인도 등
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same reasoning as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the second-class 6 through 11 of the judgment is used as follows. Thus, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited it pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(other than the part on the co-Plaintiff F of the first instance court, which has been separately determined). A list of the parts written after completion

1. On August 2006, China-China Housing Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “the instant building”) transferred its equity shares from B, the owner of the 1/2 equity share in the real estate indication (hereinafter “the instant building”) and one asset trust (hereinafter “one asset trust”) and one asset trust (hereinafter “one asset trust”) were concluded. One asset trust completed the registration of transfer of equity based on the trust on October 30, 2006 between one asset trust and one asset trust on December 10, 2015.

Meanwhile, the joint Plaintiff F of the first instance trial completed the registration of ownership transfer on June 25, 2013 between C and the owner of 1/2 shares among the instant building on the ground of sale and purchase as of May 31, 2013.

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim is accepted due to the reasons, and the judgment of the court of first instance with the same conclusion is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed.

arrow