logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.04.17 2014고단368
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes), Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and the Defendant is a person engaging in driving of a b

피고인은 2013. 12. 12. 12:50경 광주시 서구 마륵동 그린라이프신축현장 앞 도로를 그린라이프신축현장 방면에서 세정아울렛 방향으로 편도 1차로 중 1차로로 진행하다

The right of way has become a right of way.

In such cases, the driver of a motor vehicle shall accurately operate the steering system, brakes, and other devices of the motor vehicle, and shall not drive the motor vehicle at a speed or in such a manner as to inflict any danger and injury on others according to the traffic conditions of the road and the structure and performance of the motor vehicle, and there was a duty of care to report the traffic situation well and to prevent accidents in advance by driving the motor vehicle safely.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and led the Defendant to the left-hand side of the victim C (Nam, 76 years of age) who was proceeding in the direction of the Gwangju Airport at the Sejong Airport on the right-hand side of the cargo vehicle in front of the right-hand side of the vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, left the victim C with approximately four weeks of injury to the left ray and the open ke, suffered from the victim D (at the age of 70) who was on the back west of the victim the victim's right-hand bed and left-hand bed and left-hand bed, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as immediately stopping the above Oral Ba to the victim C, and taking necessary measures, such as taking relief measures against the victims.

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act at the time and at the place specified in paragraph (1) 1. The Defendant operated the B dub cargo to which mandatory insurance was not subscribed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E;

arrow