logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.04.16 2019가합893
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On December 1, 2018, between the Plaintiff, C and the Defendant, the husband of the Plaintiff, and the Defendant, concluded a sales contract with the Plaintiff that the Plaintiff and C would purchase from the Defendant for purchase of KRW 70,000,000,000 of the purchase price of KRW 673 square meters in land with a wife population D (hereinafter “instant land”) and KRW 48 square meters in land E, which is owned by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant sales contract”).

B. The instant land was included in the area of 1712 square meters in F forest with the wife population at the time of G, and was divided into the area of 470 square meters in F forest with the wife population at G-si on December 10, 2018, the area of 1712 square meters in F forest with the wife population at G-si, G forest, 63 square meters in G forest, 673 square meters in D forest, and H forest, respectively.

C. On January 9, 2019, with respect to the portion of 51/100 out of 470 square meters of land in the wife population, the ownership transfer registration was completed in the J as to the remaining 49/100 shares, and as to the remaining 51/100 shares out of 506 square meters of H forest land, the ownership transfer registration was completed in the K, and as to the remaining 49/100 shares, the ownership transfer registration was completed in the L, and as to the remaining 51/100 shares out of the instant land on January 17, 2019, the ownership transfer registration was completed in the future, and as to the remaining 49/100 shares in the Plaintiff’s land.

On May 8, 2019, the Defendant prepared a written consent to change the owner of the instant land from the Defendant to the Plaintiff and C, and delivered it to the Plaintiff.

E. C filed a complaint against the Defendant as a crime of fraud, but on September 3, 2019, upon which the Suwon District Prosecutors’ Office rendered a final decision that the Defendant was guilty, C appealed appealed on October 10, 2019.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 2, 5, 6, 12, 14, Eul evidence Nos. 2, 6, 8, 11, 13-1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) Chapter 1, Chapter 1, Chapter 1, the Defendant and the Defendant’s husband M develop the land in front of the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s husband C, and the NN University Self-gymus on the ground.

arrow