(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.11.09 2018가단112793

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.11.09 2018가단112793

건물명도(인도)

Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) Of the three floors of the buildings listed in the separate sheet, each point of the attached sheet No. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff related to the parties is a public corporation that carries out a lease business, and Nonparty B is the owner of the housing indicated in the attached Table No. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1, who entered into a lease agreement with the Plaintiff on the part (A) of 37 square meters inboard (hereinafter “instant real estate”) connected with each point of the attached Table No. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 among the above housing.

The Defendant is designated as the object of the rental business executed by the Plaintiff and leased the instant real estate from the Plaintiff.

B. On October 7, 2014, the Plaintiff concluded a lease agreement with Nonparty B on the instant real estate, and on the same day, with the Defendant, respectively, as follows (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

(The instant lease agreement has been renewed under the same condition) . - A.I.D. - (1) - The lease period: the lease period: - the lease period from October 17, 2014 to October 16, 2016 (the renewed from October 16, 2018): 50,000 won for the lease deposit (deposit) - the remainder of 2750,000 won for the down payment of KRW 550,000,000,000 for the remainder of 2750,000 won for the down payment of KRW 50,000,000 for the remainder of 2750,000 won for the remainder of 2750,000 won for the down payment of the remainder to Nonparty B (2) - the lease period of this case for the Plaintiff: October 17, 2014 to October 16, 2016 (Renewal until October 16, 2018).

C. From August 31, 2017 to March 31, 2018, the Defendant delayed to pay a total of KRW 645,600 (including arrears and allowances for bad debts).

The copy of the complaint of this case was served on the Defendant on the ground that the Defendant’s termination of the lease contract was in arrears.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 7, purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of recognition, the instant lease agreement was terminated upon the Plaintiff’s declaration of termination on the ground of the Defendant’s delinquency in rent.

I would like to say.

Therefore, the defendant is therefore the plaintiff.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 2019.05.02 2018가단551441

-서울동부지방법원 2020.05.27 2019가단18663

-광주지방법원목포지원 2017.07.12 2016가단9832

-춘천지방법원원주지원 2020.12.18 2020가단57044

-대구지방법원 2017.10.24 2016가단25673