logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원원주지원 2020.12.18 2020가단57044
건물인도
Text

1. The defendant delivered the apartment in the attached list to the plaintiff.

2. The litigation costs shall be borne by the defendant.

3.

Reasons

1. On August 29, 2019, the Plaintiff reverted to the trust property from the lessee B (State) of the apartment as listed in the attached Table (hereinafter referred to as the apartment of this case, hereinafter referred to as the “instant apartment”).

(A) On October 5, 2015, B(State) entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant.

Lease period: From October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2017: 28,211,000 won: 235,090 won (Evidence 2)

3. The Plaintiff succeeded to the status of a lessor of a lease agreement between B (State) and the Defendant, as in paragraph 1.

4. Default, renewal of rents, etc.;

(a) Default on rents: Default on the payment of rent amounting to KRW 6,723,160 as of August 10, 2020, etc. (Article 10(1)4 of the General Conditions of Contracts - Evidence A 2);

B. The defendant who has not entered into a renewed lease contract does not enter into a renewed lease contract even though it is necessary to enter into a renewed lease contract with the increased deposit and monthly rent upon the expiration of the previous lease contract period.

[Article 8 (Cancellation and Termination of Lease Contract) (1) No. 11-Lessee violates his/her duty under this Lease Contract]

5. The apartment of this case is subject to conversion for sale after 10 years of lease, so if the above reasons such as default have been resolved and the sale requirements are satisfied, it may be sold in lots.

6. In conclusion, the plaintiff terminated the lease contract by delivering a copy of the complaint, so the defendant has to perform his/her duty as stated in the purport of the claim.

arrow