All appeals filed by the Plaintiff and the Defendants are dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne individually by each person.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of this court’s judgment citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and such judgment is citing the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The second part of the judgment of the court of first instance, which was accepted, is "1. Recognizing the facts".

Part 2 of Paragraph 2 of the same Article states "five-story neighborhood living facilities and accommodation facilities on the ground" as "five-story neighborhood living facilities and accommodation facilities on the ground of reinforced concrete tanks, five-story living facilities and accommodation facilities on the ground, 280.48 square meters on the ground, 280.05 square meters on the second floor, 3 through 5-story, 272.25 square meters on each floor, and 283.56 square meters on the underground floor."

The third part of the judgment of the first instance is "repairer sent by the defendant," and the third part of the judgment is "repairer H".

The third part of the judgment of the first instance is "this court" and the third part of the judgment of the first instance is "the first instance court".

The testimony of the witness G shall be deemed to be “the testimony of the witness G” of the 6th judgment of the first instance court.

The following shall be added to the seventh-party 21 of the first instance judgment:

③ At the time of the instant sales contract, the Defendant had no water leakage phenomenon in the instant telecom, and the Plaintiff started to acquire and manage it on the rooftop, and there was a water leakage by neglecting to install and manage the illegal building on the rooftop.

“,” but there is no objective evidence corresponding thereto, the following is added to the 9th sentence of the first instance judgment, 16th sentence.

⑤ If a detailed investigation or inspection was conducted in detail prior to the conclusion of the instant sales contract, the Plaintiff appears to have been likely to have discovered such defect, and 6. It seems that there is a limit for an appraiser to grasp and calculate the repair cost after the fact that there was a defect that existed at the time of concluding the instant sales contract and the repair cost therefrom.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and all appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendants are dismissed.